Navigation
Users Online Now
» Guests Online: 1

» Members Online: 0

» Total Members: 1
» Newest Member: Admin
Hydra is affilliated with the following programs and organisations:

The Hydra coordinater FhG FIT is a member of ARTEMISIA, the association for R&D actors in the field of ARTEMIS: Advanced Research & Technology for EMbedded Intelligence and Systems.


The Hydra middleware allows developers to create inclusive applications with a high degree of accessibility for all. The Hydra project supports the Commissions campaign: eInclusion - be part of it!



The Hydra project is part of the Cluster of European projects on the Internet of Things. The Cluster aims to promote a common vision of the Internet of Things.


The Hydra project is co-funded by the European Commission within the Sixth Framework Programme in the area of Networked Embedded Systems under contract IST-2005-034891




Why not see the on-line Hydrademo? You can turn on and off devices and follow the energy consumption in real time. Just click on the picture and you see it!

News
Popular Downloads
Sign In
Enter Username

Password



Forgot Password?
Articles Hierarchy
PAW

Full Name:

Privacy in an Ambient World

Basic data:

Type of the project:Privacy based project funded by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs
Launch:October 2003
Duration:4 years
Consortium:8 partners

Website

http://www.cs.ru.nl/paw/

Description:

PAW aimed at providing full privacy in an ambient world by developing privacy protection architecture. It proposed four categories of privacy:
  • Protecting a person’s identity
  • Protecting a person’s personal data
  • Protecting the actions of an identity
  • Protecting the instructions or tasks of an identity.

While the first two categories are clear in meaning, there is a slight difference between the last two. In the third category the identity is present while the action is executed (maybe in an untrustworthy environment) while in the fourth category the identity is not present when action/tasks/instructions are executed (for example mobile agents). To provide full privacy, it assumes that for each category adequate solutions need to be found. Protecting a person’s identity can be achieved by using pseudo-identities or anonymous connections. The other three categories of privacy can be achieved by the use of ‘Licenses’ during communication.

PAW proposes a license language “that allows agents to distribute data with usage policies in a decentralized architecture”. The framework does not enforce that the data is used in compliance with the license. But the agents may be audited by an auditing authority which can be of any form, such as another agent or even a group of other agents. To enable auditing, the licenses and actions are stored in such a way that the auditing authority can access it at any arbitrary point in time. Actions here can be the transmission of a license or data. Also a model for proofing is described for an agent to be allowed to perform a certain action on the data. For that proofing, a scheme is proposed for securing data accountability based on time stamping and a signature, which are not maintained by centralized authorities. Thus, each agent can use a time stamping and signing authority which he trusts.
Relevance to HYDRA:The advantage of the proposal is the decentralization, where no central authority for controlling is necessary. But unfortunately an agent can use data in a way which it is not allowed to do and can only be held responsible after the misuse of the data and so this is not ideal for real scenarios.